I waited a couple weeks to read this book after finishing The Omnivore’s Dilemma, because I figured that it would cover much of the same material. For different reasons, I wasn’t quite right and I wasn’t quite wrong.
Pollan seems to have taken The Omnivore’s Dilemma as a starting point, and then gone on to a slightly different tangent with In Defense of Food. This book moved on from talking about various food chains towards a general discussion of “food” as we know it (or don’t). Significantly shorter than the first book, In Defense of Food is an interesting analysis of what is wrong with how Americans – or anyone else eating a “Western diet” – are eating and what it is doing to our health.