Probably the highlights of this book were the intrigue between La Valliere and the King and the one involving Aramis and the Bastille. It’s really still just a setup for the final events to come, but it was still far better and more interesting than The Vicomte de Bragelonne was. At least things were happening, and not just threatening to happen!
This is probably the most boring installment of the series, and it took me forever to read it. There are several plot arcs that are set up in this volume that come up again in more detail later. I know they’re necessary, but they still weren’t very interesting to me.
Twenty Years After is the second book in the D’Artagnon Romances, after The Three Musketeers. It continues the storyline with Milady by having the musketeers face off with her son, and it ties into political matters more than the first book did.
To be honest, there were things I liked better in this book and things that I disliked.
Until now, I hadn’t gotten around to reading the original books – the D’Artagnon Romances – that these are based on. And now I’m so glad that I have! There’s much more detail and nuance to the stories than a movie could ever portray, even if they had been made completely faithful to the source text. I feel like there’s a bit of the history of literature that I’m now more privy to than I was before.
This past weekend, I listened to the book in less than two days. It’s not a long book, but it’s definitely a book that feels as though it should be read all at once. You could probably read it to a kid split into sections, but for adult reading, it’s definitely a one-or-two-sitting read. I’m also glad that I hadn’t watched The Wizard of Oz recently, because it might have thrown me for a loop how many things were different.