Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History (Review)

Title: Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History

Author: Florence Williams

Narrator: Kate Reading

Publication Year: 2012

Pages: 352 (audio length: 9 hours 43 minutes)

Genre: Non-Fiction

Source: Audiobook version purchased from Audible.com

From the cover:

Did you know that breast milk contains substances similar to cannabis? Or that it’s sold on the Internet for 262 times the price of oil? Feted and fetishized, the breast is an evolutionary masterpiece. But in the modern world, the breast is changing. Breasts are getting bigger, arriving earlier, and attracting newfangled chemicals. Increasingly, the odds are stacked against us in the struggle with breast cancer, even among men. What makes breasts so mercurial — and so vulnerable?

In this informative and highly entertaining account, intrepid science reporter Florence Williams sets out to uncover the latest scientific findings from the fields of anthropology, biology, and medicine. Her investigation follows the life cycle of the breast from puberty to pregnancy to menopause, taking her from a plastic surgeon’s office where she learns about the importance of cup size in Texas to the laboratory where she discovers the presence of environmental toxins in her own breast milk. The result is a fascinating exploration of where breasts came from, where they have ended up, and what we can do to save them.

This book was absolutely fascinating.

Seriously! Not only did it talk about the history of breasts – like how we probably ended up with them in the first place, and how attitudes towards breastfeeding have changed over the years – it also included quite a lot of information about how our breasts function throughout our lives. There was a wealth of information about puberty, breastfeeding, sexual attraction, and health concerns (including breast cancer) that I’d never known before. And it was all presented in a simple, matter-of-fact, friendly manner. It felt a lot like something Mary Roach would’ve written, but with a little more seriousness and a little bit less tongue-in-cheek humour.

One thing I will say: Breasts definitely changed how I look at a lot of things. For one, it’s made me absolutely terrified about some of the chemicals we surround ourselves with in our modern life. Williams talks, in particular, about how the chemicals that hold our food and our beauty products – as well as the chemicals that are in these products themselves! – are ending up stored in our breast tissue and are being transmitted through our breastmilk. (Yikes!) As a result of this book, I’ve actually started thinking very critically about some of the products that I use in my day-to-day life, and I’m trying to figure out how I can limit exposure to as many of them as possible.

The only negative thing I can say about this book is that it left out a few issues I would’ve liked it to cover. Williams went into detail about the history of breast augmentation, but never got into anything about other breast surgeries – such as reductions or mastectomies. She mentions breast cancer a few times, but never really goes into the surgery end of things … whereas she did do this in the case of implants.

I’d definitely recommend that you read Breasts, whether in traditional form or as an audiobook. Reading did a fantastic job with the narration. She kept the tone light and interesting all through the book, even when it got into the more complex science. If you’ve got breasts, or know and love someone who has breasts, I think you should read this book! There’s just so much to know that we’re not aware of, and I think that the more we educate ourselves, the better. And, really, how better to do that than with an accessible book like this one?

Rating:

24 Hour Read-A-Thon: Rakem Sitta

From 4pm this afternoon until 4pm tomorrow afternoon, I’m joining in on the 24 Hour Read-A-Thon! It’s sort of a reading challenge, only everyone participates at the same time. For 24 hours, we read books, post in our blogs about our reading, and visit other readers’ blogs. We also participate in mini-challenges throughout the day.

This is my sixth time participating in the read-a-thon. This time, I’m only reading, no cheerleading or mini-challenge hosting. Normally, I would be at work tomorrow, but I have the day off to attend a job interview – so I’ll actually get to participate in more of the readathon this time than I did in the fall!

Here’s what I’ve got in the house to choose from over the next 24 hours:

  • Twenty Years After (a little over 4 hours left in the audiobook at the start time)
  • Sex and God at Yale (audiobook)
  • Cemetery John (audiobook)
  • Confessions of an Arabic Interpreter
  • Running With Scissors
  • The Taqwacores (which I started a few weeks ago in Beirut)
  • Sex and the Citadel
  • “?? ???” (an Arabic children’s book)

Updates

Hour 1: 4-5pm

Introductory Questionnaire:

  1. What fine part of the world are you reading from today? - I’m reading today from my partner’s house in Dubai.
  2. Which book in your stack are you most looking forward to? - I’m looking forward to Confessions of an Arabic Interpreter. I heard the author speak at a bunch of events at the Emirates Festival of Literature this year and haven’t gotten to picking up his book that we bought yet.
  3. Which snack are you most looking forward to? - Last night, I spent hours (upon hours) preparing Warak Enab Bi Zeit. The batch is on the stove right now cooking, and will be ready to eat by late this evening!
  4. Tell us a little something about yourself!I really should be spending this weekend addressing wedding invitations rather than readathoning.
  5. If you participated in the last read-a-thon, what’s one thing you’ll do different today? If this is your first read-a-thon, what are you most looking forward to?I’m not going to worry so much about how many hours I read. Today’s mission is to read as much as I can, but still keep it balanced with enough sleep to be functional (and un-grumpy) tomorrow.

For about half of the first hour, we had people over, so I didn’t get to start reading right away like I would’ve liked. Once they left, though, I went on to start listening to Twenty Years After.

Hour 2: 5-6pm

Listened to Twenty Years After while Zaid went to visit at his parents’ house.

Hour 3: 6-7pm

Continue listening to Twenty Years After while Zaid visited his parents. I also had a very short nap.

Hour 4-6: 7-8pm

Continue listening to Twenty Years After while Zaid visited his parents. Finished cooking the stuffed grape leaves.

Hour 5: 8-9pm

Continued listening to Twenty Years After. Ate stuffed grape leaves for dinner while watching an episode of The Big Bang Theory to break up my reading.

Mini-Challenge Re-Title Your Current Read: I would probably re-name this book Twenty Naps Later. Seriously. Maybe it wouldn’t be so bad in dead-tree form, but this narrator has been killing me since I first picked it up. And the whole audiobook is 28 hours long.

Hour 6: 9-10pm

Continued listening to Twenty Years After. And had a shower.

iamnotafraidHour 7: 10-11pm

Put down the Dumas for a while to pick up a bedtime story. Zaid read me La Akhafu (I Am Not Afraid), my first Arabic-language children’s book. We picked it up a few weeks ago to use to help me with my reading fluency – I know the alphabet but am very slow to decode it – and tonight I finally remembered to ask him to sit down and read it with me.

Hour 8: 11pm-12am (pre-written because I’m in bed with the lappy off…)

Now is the time when I give in for the night. One of these days I’ll be able to read for 24 hours again! But not while I’m living in a country where Sunday is a work day. :-(

Hour 9-16: 12-8am

Sleep.

Hour 17: 8-9am

Sleep, and then listening to Twenty Years After.

Hour 18: 9-10am

Listening to Twenty Years After on my way to a job interview.

Hour 19: 10-11am

Job interviewed, followed by listening to Twenty Years After as I hunted down breakfast.

Hour 20: 11am-12pm

Continued listening to Twenty Years After.

Hour 21: 12-1pm

Went to a meeting with Zaid and someone he met last week.

Hour 22: 1-2pm

Finished reading Twenty Years After. Finally! Started listening to Cemetery John on my way home from grabbing lunch.

Hour 23: 2-3pm

Now that I’m back at home, I’m going to move on to read an actual paper book. (I know, I know … shocking.) So for this hour I’m going to read The Taqwacores, see if I can get it finished by the end of the read-a-thon. Wish me luck!

Hour 24: 3-4pm

I’m continuing to read The Taqwacores right through the end. I’m on a roll!

  1. Which hour was most daunting for you? - Probably the hour before I went to sleep last night. I wasn’t really tired yet, and a part of me wanted to do the proper 24-hours-reading thing, but I knew I needed to sleep before my interview in the morning. So it was an internal struggle.
  2. Could you list a few high-interest books that you think could keep a Reader engaged for next year? - Definitely not “Twenty Years After”. Ugh.
  3. Do you have any suggestions for how to improve the Read-a-thon next year? - Maybe have a way to check if there are people who ended up participating but who hadn’t originally signed up, and thus nobody like cheerleaders notices them? That’s what happened to me this year. :-(
  4. What do you think worked really well in this year’s Read-a-thon? – Most things. It’s a pretty well-oiled machine.
  5. How many books did you read? - I finished one that’s been weighing on me for a while, and have about half-finished another book I’ve been keeping on the back-burner.
  6. What were the names of the books you read? - I finished reading “Twenty Years After”, started “Cemetery John”, and am currently working through “The Taqwacores”.
  7. Which book did you enjoy most? - Definitely “The Taqwacores”. I should’ve moved onto this one ages ago when I was feeling bored.
  8. Which did you enjoy least? - “Twenty Years After”. To be fair, though, I was already having a hard time with it before the read-a-thon.
  9. If you were a Cheerleader, do you have any advice for next year’s Cheerleaders? - Not applicable.
  10. How likely are you to participate in the Read-a-thon again? What role would you be likely to take next time? - I’ll definitely be participating again. Not sure what role I’ll take – it depends on when the October event falls and if I’m working through it again like the last one.

Sunday Salon: “Creating Compelling Literary Characters”

On the weekend of March 7-9, I went to quite a few sessions at the Emirates Airline Festival of Literature. Today, I’m going to write about what I heard (and learned) at a session called “Creating Compelling Literary Characters: Good, Evil and Lolita’s Fingers”.

Find out how, in both Ashes of the East and his latest novel Lolita’s Fingers, renowned author Waciny Laredj engages with the struggle between good and evil and the creation of compelling characters. 

Although the topic of this session was ostensibly the creation of compelling characters, it really ended up being more of a general talk about Laredj’s background and his writing. He spoke about his upbringing in Algeria in a very unprivileged and poor area, and how he would smuggle tomatoes and oranges into the country from Morocco. He talked also about the transfer of duties in his family and how that affected his upbringing: how his father was not there, so his mother replaced his father, and his grandmother replaced his mother. He spoke about how his grandmother was adamant that he learned Arabic for “his identity”, and how Arabic became the language of his soul, his spirit, instead of the language of his background. Laredj acquired Arabic by working hard for it, and so he wants to preserve that feeling. He said that he feels comforted when writing in Arabic instead of in French. He began writing about his daily heroes, such as his mother, father, and grandmother. He said that the spirit of his novels is taken from the stories that his grandmother told him as a child.

Laredj said that authors shouldn’t work on reconstructions of history because then they will become bad historians as well as bad novelists. He said that, in France, “we area always talking about constitutions and we forget that freedom can be more than just about the commercial sense”. He pointed out that women cannot be free when they are dressed in stringent Victorian style, for example.

The moderator said that Laredj has lived on the borders of two countries and doesn’t write conventional novels, biographies, or histories. In response, he said that the concept of “border” is a restriction that has been imposed on us. Laredj said that when you live between borders you must comply with the decisions of a regime, and that he has a desire to transcend these borders imposed on us. He spoke about “escaping” from the French language to the Arabic language in his writing.

Laredj spoke about writing through the metaphor of building. He said that you can give builders the same materials but you will not get the same building, because it’s not about the materials or the tools that you have. He said that if it were up to him, he would only work on confused or mystical characters, that there is a fine line between good and evil.

At the end, an audience member commented that Laredj had been the only author to mention International Women’s Day the previous evening (in another talk I was in), and asked how he relates to the women in his life. Laredj said that he was raised in an environment surrounded by women. His village was evacuated of men – through immigration and martyrdom in the Algerian revolution – and that he built a certain bond of relationship and sympathy with women. He also commented that he has a certain “feminine aspect” in his personality, a feeling of belonging. Laredj said that macho rhetoric is an empty thing that he doesn’t believe in, that he doesn’t understand fanatics. In his words, “how can you hate your mother, your lover, your sister, those who gave you life? God created us but through a means, a woman.” He said that he sees women as a very integral aspect in our lives.

I haven’t read any of Laredj’s books before, but I’m looking forward to finding an English translation of one soon. Have you read anything he’s written that you can recommend?

Love Is the Cure: On Life, Loss, and the End of AIDS (Review)

Title: Love Is the Cure: On Life, Loss, and the End of AIDS

Author/Narrator: Elton John

Publication Year: 2012

Pages: 256 (audio length: 5 hours 6 minutes)

Genre: Non-Fiction

Source: Audiobook version purchased from Audible.com

From the cover:

In the 1980s, Elton John saw friend after friend, loved one after loved one, perish needlessly from AIDS. He befriended Ryan White, a young Indiana boy ostracized because of his HIV infection. Ryan’s inspiring life and devastating death led Elton to two realizations: His own life was a mess. And he had to do something to help stop the AIDS crisis.

Since then, Elton has dedicated himself to overcoming the plague and the stigma of AIDS. The Elton John AIDS Foundation has raised and donated $275 million to date to fighting the disease worldwide. Love Is the Cure includes stories of Elton’s close friendships with Ryan White, Freddie Mercury, Princess Diana, Elizabeth Taylor, and others, and the story of the Elton John AIDS Foundation.

This is the first book that I’ve read from the non-fiction category of the Audie Awards. I kind of expected the book to be a personal reflection of Elton John’s experiences during the AIDS crisis (particularly in the beginning, since he was probably at his peak of popularity then). It is this, in part, but not completely. A large focus in the book is on the AIDS policies of governments, especially the United States, and on the politics surrounding the epidemic.

I found certain parts of the book more engaging than others. For example, I enjoyed the bits where John discussed the personal connections he had with people who had dealt with AIDS, such as his relationship with Ryan White. It really felt like it put a specific face to the issue. Personally, I was also happy that John dealt with the stigma that certain HIV/AIDS sufferers have to deal with because of not being seen as “innocent” by the general public, such as intravenous drug users. I also found it interesting that John has taken such a strong view on the responsibility that the US – and other countries – play in the fight against the disease and the failure to have eradicated it. He makes it very clear that he holds certain groups more responsible than others and lays out things they could have done to halt the spread of AIDS but have chosen not to do.

Having said that, I would recommend this book to people who are interested in reading about John’s foundation and the contributions that are being made to help support people who suffer from HIV/AIDS, and to those who want to know more about how the US responded in the beginning of the crisis. It’s not as much of a comprehensive view of things as I had thought – and hoped – it would be, though. Love is the Cure is an interesting personal statement, and I enjoyed listening to it, but I’m sure there are other books out there that are more interesting, detailed, and useful regarding the topic, and that don’t rely quite so much on “star power” for promotion and interest.

Rating:

The Table Comes First: Family, France, and the Meaning of Food (Review)

Title: The Table Comes First: Family, France, and the Meaning of Food

Author/Narrator: Adam Gopnik

Publication Year: 2011

Pages: 336 (audio length: 11 hours 4 minutes)

Genre: Non-Fiction

Source: Audiobook purchased from Audible.com

From the cover:

In this work, Gopnik charts America’s transformation from being simply aware of what they eat to being obsessive about it. This fascinating culinary journey will transport listeners from 18th-century France and the origin of America’s popular modern tastes to the kitchens of the White House and beyond.

There are quite a few different things that Gopnik does in The Table Comes First, some better than others. One of the things that he does particularly well is chart the evolution of food and culinary thinking in France throughout the ages, and explain how the history of how people have seen food has influenced the way we look at food now. He also does a good job of talking about some of the concerns in restaurant cuisine (versus home cooking), particularly in recent years as French cooking has undertaken some very drastic shifts.

Although the jacket copy of the book suggests that he will delve into the transformation of the way America looks at food, I thought that this was done less well. It was a bit spotty and wasn’t as detailed and as well-explained as the bits about the history of French food had been. There was also this thing he did where he “wrote” imaginary emails to a long-dead woman who had been a food writer or cook of some sort, which I actually found kind of annoying. I get where he was trying to go with it, tying his personal experiences and cooking into what he was writing about, but I just found that personally, it didn’t flow for me. I did find it a bit interesting when he described recipes and things he had made in these “emails”, but I think they either could have been separated off into their own sections or, perhaps, that they’re well done but just don’t fit into this book. At least, in my opinion, that might have been better.

Overall, though, The Table Comes First was an interesting look at how our ideas about the function of restaurants and of what constitutes “gourmet food” have evolved, and included some interesting personal anecdotes and touches. It wasn’t the best book I’ve read about food and food culture, but you might enjoy it more if you have a special interest in French cuisine or the history of France.

Rating:

Related Posts with Thumbnails